Geographic Internet domains Challenges for the developing Domain Name System
Main Article Content
Keywords
Internet domains, Domain Name System
Abstract
Geographic names have posed challenges for Internet domain name policy makers since the earliest days of the Domain Name System (or ‘DNS’, as it is most commonly known). As the DNS develops with the addition of hundreds of new top-level domains and the challenges posed by geographic domains are addressed only on an ad hoc basis, DNS policy on these names reduces coherency, thus reducing confidence in the DNS and its controlling authority, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). The broad range of issues currently and foreseeably raised by the use of geographic names in the DNS means that all Internet stakeholders are affected, not simply those claiming rights or interests in such names. This article offers insight into why geographic domain names remain problematic more than two decades after these issues first arose, identifies trends in DNS policy respecting geographic names and highlights the impact on various Internet stakeholders of current policy and decisions.
Downloads
References
ccNSO. 2013. ‘ccNSO Study Group on the Use of Country and Territory Names: Final Report’. [Internet] Published 2 July 2013. Accessed 7 February 2014. Available from
Forrest, Heather. 2013a. Protection of Geographic Names in International Law and Domain Name System Policy. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
Forrest, Heather. 2013b. ‘Rights Protection Mechanisms in New gTLDs: The multi-stakeholder Internet governance model at work’. 63(2) Telecommunications Journal of Australia. http://doi.org/10.7790/tja.v63i3.427
Governmental Advisory Committee (‘GAC’). 2001. ‘Meeting 10 Communique: Montevideo 7- 8 September 2001’. [Internet]. Accessed 7 February 2014. Available from https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/GAC+10+Meeting+Montevideo%2C+Uru guay+-+7-8+September+2001.
GAC. 2012a. ‘GAC Early Warning: Submittal Patagonia-AR-78254’. Issued 20 November 2012. [Internet] Accessed 7 February 2014. Available from https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27131927/Patagonia-AR- 78254.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353465809000&api=v2.
GAC. 2012b. ‘GAC Early Warning: Submittal Amazon-BR-PE-58086. Issued 20 November 2012. [Internet] Accessed 7 February 2014. Available from https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27131927/Amazon-BR-PE- 58086.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353452622000&api=v2.
GAC. 2013a. ‘GAC Communiqué - Durban, South Africa’. [Internet]. Published 18 July 2013. Accessed 7 February 2014. Available from https://gacweb.icann.org/display/GACADV/2013-07-18-Obj-Amazon.
GAC. 2013b. ‘GAC Communiqué - Buenos Aires, Argentina’. [Internet]. Published 20 November 2013. Accessed 7 February 2014. Available from: https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/Meeting+48%3A+Buenos+Aires%2C+Arg entina.
NTIA. 1998. National Telecommunications and Information Administration of the United States Department of Commerce. 1998. ‘Management of Internet Names and Addresses’. 63 Federal Register 31,741, 31,745 (10 June 1998) (White Paper). (‘NTIA’).
ICANN. 1999. Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. [Internet] As approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999. Accessed 7 February 2014. Available from http://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp/policy.
ICANN. 2012a. ‘New gTLD Applicant Guidebook’. [Internet]. Released online 4 June 2012. Accessed 19 March 2013. Available from: http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb.
ICANN. 2012b. ‘Bylaws for the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers, a California Non-Profit Public Benefit Corporation, as last amended 20 December 2012’. [Internet]. Accessed 19 March 2013. Available from: http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA.
ICANN. 2013a. ‘Base Registry Agreement’. Updated 20 November 2013. Accessed 7 February 2014. Available from http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/agreement-approved-20nov13-en.pdf.
ICANN. 2013b. ‘Trademark Clearinghouse Rights Protection Mechanism Requirements’. [Internet]. Published 30 September 2013. Accessed 7 February 2014. Available from http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse/rpm-requirements-30sep13-en.pdf.
Puerto Rico Tourism Company v. Virtual Countries, Inc., WIPO Case No. D2002-1129. Apr. 14, 2003. Available from http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2002/d2002-1129.html.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). 1998. ‘Interim Report of the WIPO Internet Domain Name Process, The Management of Internet Names and Addresses: Intellectual Property Issues’. [Internet]. Published 23 December 1998. Accessed 7 February 2014. Available from http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/processes/process1/rfc/3/index.html.
WIPO. 1999. ‘Final Report of the WIPO Internet Domain Name Process: The Management of Internet Names and Addresses: Intellectual Property Issues’. [Internet]. Published 30 April 1999. Accessed 19 March 2013. Available from http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/processes/process1/report/index.html.
ZookNIC. 2008. ‘History of gTLD domain name growth’. Available from: http://www.zooknic.com/Domains/counts.html
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright Telecommunications Association Inc.
